Anyone running 255/85/16 on their series 1 or 2
-
franko
- Out of Africa
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:15 am
- Location: Victoria BC
Anyone running 255/85/16 on their series 1 or 2
As the post says, new tires in the works and can't decide on 235/85's or 255's
I really want 255's but is that the best choice.
Cheers
Ps running paribolic springs.
I really want 255's but is that the best choice.
Cheers
Ps running paribolic springs.
-
Greg S
- Spanner Man
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 9:00 pm
- Location: Duncan
- Contact:
Re: Anyone running 255/85/16 on their series 1 or 2
Hi Franko.
I put 255 85 16 Toyo Open Country MT's on my 109 SW. They look good and grip really well. I have a military chassis with the springs located on the high ground clearance setting and with the extended shackles. This gives me a bit more clearance for the tires when turning but the steering stops still need to be set in a bit. With parabolics the tires don't rub on full articulation but do rub on the chassis and spring just before full lock.
I recommend against it. 235 85 16 are as large as I would suggest.
https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5263/5662090887_5acc92732f.jpgTires 10 10 006 by VanIsle Land Rover Network, on Flickr
255 85 16 vs 245 75 16
https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5023/5662092819_9323ba5544.jpgTires 10 10 002 by VanIsle Land Rover Network, on Flickr
I put 255 85 16 Toyo Open Country MT's on my 109 SW. They look good and grip really well. I have a military chassis with the springs located on the high ground clearance setting and with the extended shackles. This gives me a bit more clearance for the tires when turning but the steering stops still need to be set in a bit. With parabolics the tires don't rub on full articulation but do rub on the chassis and spring just before full lock.
I recommend against it. 235 85 16 are as large as I would suggest.
https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5263/5662090887_5acc92732f.jpgTires 10 10 006 by VanIsle Land Rover Network, on Flickr
255 85 16 vs 245 75 16
https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5023/5662092819_9323ba5544.jpgTires 10 10 002 by VanIsle Land Rover Network, on Flickr
Last edited by Greg S on Tue Jan 06, 2015 12:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
franko
- Out of Africa
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:15 am
- Location: Victoria BC
Re: Anyone running 255/85/16 on their series 1 or 2
Thanks Greg, I can't see the pics, but it's as I figured.
235/85 is the smart choice, would running a spacer be such a bad idea to get more track width?
235/85 is the smart choice, would running a spacer be such a bad idea to get more track width?
-
Greg S
- Spanner Man
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 9:00 pm
- Location: Duncan
- Contact:
Re: Anyone running 255/85/16 on their series 1 or 2
Fixed the photos.
I've never run spacers but they sound okay. More strain on bearings but they aren't something you often hear about failing. I'd be concerned about keeping spacers done up but there are thousands (hundreds?) of people out there running with them. Make sure the tire doesn't hang out past the fender.
I've never run spacers but they sound okay. More strain on bearings but they aren't something you often hear about failing. I'd be concerned about keeping spacers done up but there are thousands (hundreds?) of people out there running with them. Make sure the tire doesn't hang out past the fender.
-
red90
- Defender of the World
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 7:19 pm
- Location: Calgary
Re: Anyone running 255/85/16 on their series 1 or 2
But that is fixed by adjusting the steering stops, which need to be adjusted with any tire.Greg S wrote:With parabolics the tires don't rub on full articulation but do rub on the chassis and spring just before full lock.
A lot would depend on what rims you are using. Stock rims are not really wide enough for a 255.
-
HeadDamage
- Horn Blower
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 3:21 pm
- Location: Calgary
Re: Anyone running 255/85/16 on their series 1 or 2
Wolf or 130 rims are needed to properly mount 255/85/16 tires, they are 6.5" wide with more offset.
-
franko
- Out of Africa
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:15 am
- Location: Victoria BC
Re: Anyone running 255/85/16 on their series 1 or 2
Is Greg not running stock rims and 255's looks that way to me.
Anyway as much I would LOVE 255's I think 235's are the best option with stock rims and what not.
Anyway as much I would LOVE 255's I think 235's are the best option with stock rims and what not.
-
red90
- Defender of the World
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 7:19 pm
- Location: Calgary
Re: Anyone running 255/85/16 on their series 1 or 2
On a series, will this make the tire stick out past the bodywork?HeadDamage wrote:Wolf or 130 rims are needed to properly mount 255/85/16 tires, they are 6.5" wide with more offset.
-
HeadDamage
- Horn Blower
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 3:21 pm
- Location: Calgary
Re: Anyone running 255/85/16 on their series 1 or 2
It would be close, not sure how close but 255 on a 5.5" rim is too pinched.
-
shawn doherty
- Wrecker Bait
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 7:09 pm
- Location: Kingfisher BC
Re: Anyone running 255/85/16 on their series 1 or 2
I bought 255 85 16 tires for my stock series 111 109 back in 2003 they were mounted on stock rims and I have since sold the truck. The tires are still on the truck and I never had any issues except a higher cruising speed and higher ground clearance.
-
Peter Knowles
- Junior Craftsman
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 7:13 pm
Re: Anyone running 255/85/16 on their series 1 or 2
I've run BFG MT 255/85/16's for years.
I have 1 ton rims and 1-1/4" spacers.
EX-MOD chassis on the lifted holes.
Rubber is just barely proud of the bodywork.
Love Em!
Love Em!
Peter
I have 1 ton rims and 1-1/4" spacers.
EX-MOD chassis on the lifted holes.
Rubber is just barely proud of the bodywork.
Love Em!
Love Em!
Peter
- Attachments
-
- 003-002.JPG
- (194.65 KiB) Downloaded 6234 times
-
franko
- Out of Africa
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:15 am
- Location: Victoria BC
Re: Anyone running 255/85/16 on their series 1 or 2
Hey Pete, did you flip your rims around. Maybe it's just the picture, but it kinda looks like it.
-
Rob
- Greasy Fingers
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 12:37 am
- Location: Ladysmith
Re: Anyone running 255/85/16 on their series 1 or 2
Here's a good thread I found about series tires (this topic is often discussed... maybe it is time for a forum sticky?). http://www.landroversonly.com/forums/f4 ... 0-a-38185/
Here's a calculator that shows the differences between the tires http://www.tacomaworld.com/forum/tireca ... -255-85r16
Personally I've had 750-16s on most of my series trucks and have been happy. I run 235-85R16s MTs (very close to a 750-16 in dimension) on my Defender 130 and the truck does fine. Series trucks in their original configuration are light and don't have a lot of horsepower and while it is possible to fit bigger tires I question if there is enough improvement in performance to make the expense and effort worth it...
I did a quick check, you'd save over a $100 for a set of 4 BFG MTs at Crappy Tire if you went for the 235's instead of the 255s... not to mention how much you'd save by not having to buy new rims to fit the tires.
Anyway, there's my 2 cents worth.
Here's a calculator that shows the differences between the tires http://www.tacomaworld.com/forum/tireca ... -255-85r16
Personally I've had 750-16s on most of my series trucks and have been happy. I run 235-85R16s MTs (very close to a 750-16 in dimension) on my Defender 130 and the truck does fine. Series trucks in their original configuration are light and don't have a lot of horsepower and while it is possible to fit bigger tires I question if there is enough improvement in performance to make the expense and effort worth it...
I did a quick check, you'd save over a $100 for a set of 4 BFG MTs at Crappy Tire if you went for the 235's instead of the 255s... not to mention how much you'd save by not having to buy new rims to fit the tires.
Anyway, there's my 2 cents worth.
-
Peter Knowles
- Junior Craftsman
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 7:13 pm
Re: Anyone running 255/85/16 on their series 1 or 2
Hi Franco,
No, they're 130 rims, ANR 1534, terribly pricy but 6.5" wide with a very deep offset.
Peter
No, they're 130 rims, ANR 1534, terribly pricy but 6.5" wide with a very deep offset.
Peter
-
franko
- Out of Africa
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:15 am
- Location: Victoria BC
Re: Anyone running 255/85/16 on their series 1 or 2
Well back to square one, looks like I have the stock 15" rims on my series.
So unless I can find some cheap 16" rims ( maybe disco steel) then I'll look for a 31x9.5x15
So unless I can find some cheap 16" rims ( maybe disco steel) then I'll look for a 31x9.5x15
